Pulse Engine: the independent audit

by Jimmy Peter Eriksson · MQL5 product #165801 · multi-symbol (EURUSD.ls chart) · version tested: v2.0 (EA journal print; product page showed 1.90 on 2026-08-13)

Test windowM1 (2020.01.01 - 2026.08.11)
ModelEvery tick based on real ticks, 10 ms execution delay
History quality13% real ticks
Trades reconstructed2801
Pairing confidenceexact
Tester log analyzedyes
Report SHA-256584e33f69643cd7a65347cef…

What the numbers already show

Measured by our engine on this exact run, not taken from vendor claims. The mechanism behind each number, the full six-dimension verdict and every chart are in the audit.

What the audit contains

The verdict itself is inside the audit. We don't publish it, so it stays worth exactly $19 to you instead of zero to everyone.

Instant download (HTML, printable). Version-specific: v2.0 (EA journal print; product page showed 1.90 on 2026-08-13) on the window above.

Questions before you buy

Did you run this test yourselves?

Yes. Every catalog audit is our own strategy-tester run under the documented protocol (real ticks, 10 ms delay, vendor defaults), not a screenshot of vendor material.

Can Pulse Engine pass a prop-firm challenge?

We measure it instead of guessing: the audit replays three prop rule sets (IQ Capital, FTMO, a generic 6% trailing profile) day by day over all 2801 reconstructed trades, then runs the challenge as a Monte-Carlo simulation at seven position sizings, with intraday equity resolution. That resolution can collapse naive end-of-day pass rates (our most dramatic sample: 97% EOD became 17% intraday). The pass-probability curve for Pulse Engine is inside the audit.

What monthly withdrawal could Pulse Engine sustain?

The audit contains a withdrawal replay: the strategy re-run as if someone lived off it, with monthly payouts, months paid versus dry months and the longest dry streak, plus a safe-sizing table answering how small you must trade to keep ruin risk under 10%. The numbers for Pulse Engine are inside the audit.

Is Pulse Engine a grid or martingale EA?

We classify structure from the deal list, not from the equity curve: split tickets, adds into adverse moves and size escalation are counted, not guessed. The audit states the classification for Pulse Engine with the exact counts behind it.

Which version does the audit cover?

Version v2.0 (EA journal print; product page showed 1.90 on 2026-08-13) on the window above. Audits are version-specific: if the vendor ships a new version, the audit states exactly what was tested.

I already run Pulse Engine myself. Is this still useful?

The catalog audit covers the vendor-default setup. For your own settings and broker, audit your own tester report instead: same engine, same $19.

Is the verdict positive or negative?

That is the one thing we sell. It is inside the audit, with the evidence. What we publish for free is how the test was run, plus three complete sample audits (The Gold Reaper, Waka Waka, Quantum Queen X), so you can judge our method before paying.

Protocol: how we test · Not this EA? Catalog · Audit your own report